|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Use of Positron Emission Tomography With (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infection
Patrick Lauwers, MD,
Sylvie Van den Broeck, MD,
Laurens Carp, MD,
Jeroen Hendriks, PhD,
Paul Van Schil, PhD*,
and
Pierre Blockx, PhD
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.van.schil{at}uza.be.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Vascular graft infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Diagnosis is difficult, as there is no single diagnostic criterion that has a 100% accuracy. A combination of physical examination, laboratory tests, and several imaging techniques is mandatory. Beside a wide range of indications in the oncological field, positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has a well-known role in the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue infections. Some authors have recently reported on the potential use of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of vascular graft infections. The aim of this study is to review personal experience. Five consecutive patients with a suspected prosthetic infection (1 aortobifemoral bypass, 3 femoropopliteal bypasses, and 1 femorofemoral bypass) underwent FDG-PET. All prostheses showed a moderate or intense FDG tracer uptake. All 3 patients with an intense FDG uptake proved to have a prosthetic infection (based on microbiologic examination). These preliminary results suggest that FDG-PET might be an interesting tool to confirm vascular graft infection.
First published on December 10, 2007, doi:10.1177/0003319707299205
Angiology 2008;58:717.
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|