Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0003319707303889v1
59/2/193    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caymaz, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caymaz, H. O.
Right arrow Articles by Yüksel, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Fate of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Hüseyin Oguz Caymaz, MD

Cardiology Department, School of Medicine, University of Marmara, ocaymaz{at}superonline.com

Güvenç Yüksel, MD

Cardiology Department, Yeni Isviçre Hastanesi Istanbul, Turkey

The authors aimed to determine the incidence and angiographic features associated with plaque progression requiring nontarget lesion percutaneous coronary intervention after culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention. Of 945 consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions reviewed, 100 patients who required nontarget lesion percutaneous coronary intervention in the following year of the index percutaneous coronary intervention were found and compared with 100 consecutive patients who did not require nontarget lesion percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with restenosis were excluded. Incidence of clinical plaque progression leading to additional nontarget lesion percutaneous coronary intervention in the year after an index percutaneous coronary intervention was found to be 10.5%. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, the predictors of plaque progression were multivessel disease, unstable angina pectoris, diabetes mellitus, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, and lack of statin use. Initially, lesions that lead to repercutaneous coronary intervention were mostly nonsignificant. Clinical presentation of plaque progression was mostly acute coronary syndrome. Results emphasize the need for further study to refine the methods to identify potentially vulnerable but clinically silent plaques.

Key Words: coronary disease • plaque progression • angioplasty

This version was published on May 1, 2008

Angiology, Vol. 59, No. 2, 193-197 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0003319707303889


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement