This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0003319707299205v1 58/6/717    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lauwers, P. Articles by Blockx, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lauwers, P. Articles by Blockx, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Use of Positron Emission Tomography With (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infection

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium, patrick.lauwers{at}uza.be

Sylvie Van den Broeck, MD

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Laurens Carp, MD

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Jeroen Hendriks, PhD

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Paul Van Schil, PhD

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Pierre Blockx, PhD

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Vascular graft infection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Diagnosis is difficult, as there is no single diagnostic criterion that has a 100% accuracy. A combination of physical examination, laboratory tests, and several imaging techniques is mandatory. Beside a wide range of indications in the oncological field, positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has a well-known role in the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue infections. Some authors have recently reported on the potential use of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of vascular graft infections. The aim of this study is to review personal experience. Five consecutive patients with a suspected prosthetic infection (1 aortobifemoral bypass, 3 femoropopliteal bypasses, and 1 femorofemoral bypass) underwent FDG-PET. All prostheses showed a moderate or intense FDG tracer uptake. All 3 patients with an intense FDG uptake proved to have a prosthetic infection (based on microbiologic examination). These preliminary results suggest that FDG-PET might be an interesting tool to confirm vascular graft infection.

This version was published on January 1, 2008

Angiology, Vol. 58, No. 6, 717-724 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0003319707299205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?