| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Effects of Statins on Restenosis After Coronary Stent ImplantationDepartment of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan, kamishirado{at}icnet.ne.jp
Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Department of Cardiology, Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Koshigaya, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Department of Cardiology, Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Koshigaya, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Department of Cardiology, Koshigaya Hospital, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Koshigaya, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Medicine, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Kamishirado Heart Clinic, Ichikawa, Japan
Experimental data and preliminary clinical studies suggest that lipid-lowering drugs might have a beneficial effect on restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Recently, statins have been focused on prevention of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. However, their benefit has not yet been established. The authors studied the effects of statins on stent restenosis. We compared retrospectively the quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) variables between 62 dyslipidemic patients treated with statins (pravastatin or fluvastatin) and 62 normolipidemic patients, as a control, treated without statins after undergoing successful coronary stent implantation with 6-month follow-up angiography from May 1999 to December 2002. Major cardiac events were about the same in both groups. Each of the QCA variables before and immediately after coronary stenting was similar in the 2 groups. At follow-up angiography, however, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (2.12
Angiology, Vol. 58, No. 1,
55-60 (2007) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
0.73 vs 1.78 