Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demir, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Korkmaz, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demir, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Korkmaz, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Do Different Atrial Flutter Types Carry the Same Thromboembolic Risk?

Ahmet Duran Demir, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, demirad{at}ixir.com

Mustafa Soylu, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Özcan Özdemir, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Serkan Topaloglu, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Dursun Aras, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Ali Íasmaz, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Íule Korkmaz, MD

Department of Cardiology at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Thromboembolic risk of atrial flutter (AFl) types has not been elucidated sufficiently in previous reports. The authors classified the patients according to surface electrocardiogram and electrophysiologic characteristics as those with typical AFl (37 patients, 78.4% male, mean age 59.8 ±9.5 years) and atypical AFl (13 patients, 69.2% male, mean age 60.9 ±6.9 years) and compared them regarding some clinical, echocardiographic, and hematologic parameters. An age- and gender-matched control group composed of 20 individuals without any organic heart disease in sinus rhythm was chosen (80% male, mean age 60.3 ±7.9 years). Clinical features such as age, gender, organic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, AFl duration, and the prevalence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were similar in both AFl groups. Echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial (LA) diameter, LA spontaneous echo contrast, and LA appendage emptying velocities were similar in both AFl groups. Fibrinogen, fibrin D-dimer, and thrombin-antithrombin III levels reflecting coagulation system activity were found to be increased in the patients with atypical AFl when compared with those with typical AFl and the control group (p<0.001). In Pearson’s correlation analysis, significant correlation between these hematologic markers and clinical and echocardiographic parameters were not found (p>0.05). The coagulation system activity was found to be increased in patients with atypical AFl. Thus, anticoagulation due to the increased thromboembolic risk should be considered in patients with atypical AFl.

Angiology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 593-599 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970505600511


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement