This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Salmasi, A.-M. Articles by Dancy, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salmasi, A.-M. Articles by Dancy, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Diabetes High Blood Pressure Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Glucose Tolerance Test, But Not HbA 1c, Remains the Gold Standard in Identifying Unrecognized Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Hypertensive Subjects

Cardiac Research Unit, Cardiology Department, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, United Kingdom, majeed.salmasi{at}nwlh.nhs.uk

Mark Dancy, FRCP

Cardiac Research Unit, Cardiology Department, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, United Kingdom

The objective of this study was to compare the value of the oral glucose tolerance test (GTT), glycated hemoglobin concentration (HbA_1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for identifying unrecognized diabetes mellitus (DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in hypertensive subjects. One hundred forty-four consecutive subjects who were not known to have DM and who were attending the Hypertension Clinic underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. A GTT and an HbA_1c measurement were also carried out. Abnormal results from GTT were found in 94 patients (65%). Results from FPG were not different between those with DM and IGT but were significantly higher than in the euglycemic subjects. The FPG was between 110-125 mg/dL (6.1-6.9 mmol/L) in 31% (n=20) of patients with IGT and in 53% (n=16) of those with DM. With use of the previously published criteria to diagnose DM of FPG 103 mg/dL (5.7 mmol/L) and HbA_1c 5.9%, 33% of our diabetic subjects and 75% of those with IGT would have been misclassified as euglycemic. The previously reported cut-off point for HbA_1c of >6.1% to diagnose DM was present in 77% of our patients with DM and in 14% (n=9) of the patients with IGT. Multiple regression analysis showed that an abnormal result from GTT was independent of the level of clinical or ambulatory BP, nocturnal BP dip, cholesterol level, smoking history, race, or class of antihypertensive medication taken. FPG levels or HbA_1c, or their combination, are not accurate enough to identify DM or IGT in patients attending a hospital Hypertension Clinic. A GTT may be required in these patients to reliably identify those with DM or IGT.

Angiology, Vol. 56, No. 5, 571-579 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970505600508


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Rosenzweig, E. Ferrannini, S. M. Grundy, S. M. Haffner, R. J. Heine, E. S. Horton, and R. Kawamori Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in Patients at Metabolic Risk: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 3671 - 3689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]