SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chockalingam, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arul, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chockalingam, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arul, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Safety and Efficacy of Enalapril in Multivalvular Heart Disease with Significant Mitral Stenosis—SCOPE-MS

Anand Chockalingam, AB, (DNB)

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India, drcanands{at}yahoo.co.in

S. Venkatesan, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

Smrita Dorairajan, (DNB)

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

V. Chockalingam, MD, DM, FACC

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

T. Subramaniam, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

V. Jaganathan, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

S. Elangovan, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

R. Alagesan, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

G. Gnanavelu, MD, DM

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

A. S. Arul, MD, (DM)

Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are often used in preventing and treating heart failure due to regurgitant valve disease. The majority of patients with symptomatic rheumatic heart disease (RHD) have significant mitral stenosis (MS) and are denied ACEI therapy, because of the fear of hypotension in the presence of fixed obstruction. The authors assessed the safety and efficacy of ACEI in 109 consecutive patients with RHD and with significant mitral stenosis (mitral valve orifice, MVO <1.5 cm2) and with NYHA class III or IV heart failure symptoms. Mean age was 33.1 ±12 years, systolic blood pressure (BP) was 111 ±10, and diastolic BP was 73 ±8 mm Hg. MS was significant in 100 patients with mitral regurgitation in 46, aortic regurgitation in 19, and pulmonary hypertension in 60 patients. After initial stabilization, enalapril 2.5 mg bid was started in hospital and titrated up to 10 mg bid over 2 weeks. NYHA status, Borg score, and 6-minute walk test were assessed at baseline, and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Seventy-nine of the 100 patients who completed the study had severe MS (MVO <1.0 cm2). Enalapril was well tolerated by all study patients without hypotension or worsening of symptoms. NYHA class (3.2 ±0.5 baseline vs 2.3 ±0.5 at 4 weeks, p<0.01) Borg Dyspnea Index (7.6 ±1.3 vs 5.6 ±1.3, p<0.01), and 6-minute walk distance (226 ±106 vs 299 ±127 m, p<0.01) improved significantly with enalapril. Patients with associated regurgitant lesions showed more improvement in exercise capacity (120 ±93 vs 39 ±56 m, p<0.001). Enalapril was well tolerated in patients with RHD with moderate and severe MS. Irrespective of the valve pathology, enalapril improved functional status and exercise capacity with maximum benefit in patients with concomitant regurgitant valvular heart disease.

Angiology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 151-158 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970505600205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. J. Oh, J. H. Lee, S. B. Nam, J. K. Shim, J. H. Song, and Y. L. Kwak
Effects of chronic angiotensin II receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatments on neurohormonal levels and haemodynamics during cardiopulmonary bypass
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 792 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement