This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Övünc, K. Articles by Kes, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Övünc, K. Articles by Kes, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Mesothelioma Pleural Disorders Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Percutaneous Balloon Pericardiotomy for Patients with Malignant Pericardial Effusion Including Three Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomas

Kudret Aytemir

Necla Özer

Enver Atalar

Serdar Aksöyek

Nasih Nazh

Güner Gürsel

Sirri Kes

Ten patients were enrolled in this study to evaluate the therapeutic value of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion secondary to malignant diseases. Four patients had breast cancer; 2 had lung cancer; 1 had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; and 3 had malignant pleural mesothelioma, which is commonly seen in Central Anatolian region of Turkey. All patients underwent percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy with monofoil balloons (Mansfield, NuMed). No complication was seen during these procedures. In 3 patients, the balloon could not be expanded completely and was entered from a more lateral position by a second puncture. There was no recurrence of pericardial effusion in 6 of 7 patients without mesothelioma. After percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy, surgical subxiphoid windowing was performed due to drainage greater than 100 mL/day in a patient with lung cancer and in 1 patient with mesothelioma. In the other 2 patients with mesothelioma, recur rence of pericardial effusion was seen and then subxiphoid surgical windowing was performed due to development of cardiac tamponade in 1 of them. All the patients died 68.6 ±36 days later due to the primary malignancies. The survival time of patients with mesothelioma was shorter than that of the others (p < 0.05).

These results suggest that percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy may be used in the treatment of patients with malignant pericardial effusion as an alternative to surgical pericar dial window creation. But in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, the success rate of this procedure was lower than that of the others.

Angiology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 323-329 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970105200505


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?