This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Antignani, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Antignani, P. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Classification of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: A Review

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a very variable and complex entity that has stimulated different attempts at classification. Several proposals have been made in recent years, based on objective and anatomical criteria, most of them incomplete and unsatisfactory. Finally the CEAP classification was presented in 1994. This certainly is the most nearly complete classi fication, since it takes into consideration not only the main aspects of CVI: Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological, but also the degrees of severity, reported in the form of scores. It is now accepted internationally although it still has some flaws (such as the absence of the corona phlebectactica sign) and inaccuracies (above all in the clinical part and the scoring). Recently, some members of the Promoting Committee proposed a substantial modi fication of the part on scores, coming closest to the clinical reality, instrumental diagnosis, and current therapies. The characteristics of CEAP enable us to affirm that this represents the most original and useful classification, not only for clinical studies, but also in the assessment of therapeutic results and in patient follow-up. Like all classifications, CEAP also needs to be validated by means of clinical studies in order to demonstrate its applicability. For this purpose, a European Working Group was set up in 1997. The first interesting results of 872 dossiers collected by means of a computerized program (European Phlebological File) were presented at several international congresses and concentrated on the consistency and reproducibility of the clinical part of the CEAP classification in different clinical settings.

Angiology, Vol. 52, No. 1 suppl, S17-S26 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970105200103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.R. Cesarone, G. Belcaro, S. Errichi, U. Cornelli, L. Pellegrini, I. Ruffini, B.M. Errichi, A. Ledda, G. Vinciguerra, A. Ricci, et al. Topical Heparin: New Observations Angiology, April 1, 2007; 58(1S): 16S - 20S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Belcaro, M. R. Cesarone, and M. Dugall Microcirculatory Efficacy of Topical Treatment with Aescin + Essential Phospholipids Gel in Venous Insufficiency and Hypertension: New Clinical Observations Angiology, November 1, 2004; 55(6_suppl): S1 - S5. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Cesarone, G. Belcaro, E. Ippolito, A. Ricci, M. Ruffini, and M. Dugall Microcirculatory Efficacy of Topical Treatment with Aescin + Essential Phospholipids Gel on Transcutaneous PO2 in Venous Insufficiency Angiology, November 1, 2004; 55(6_suppl): S7 - S10. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Ruffini, G. Belcaro, M. R. Cesarone, and M. Dugall Efficacy of Topical Treatment with Aescin + Essential Phospholipids Gel in Venous Insufficiency and Hypertension Angiology, November 1, 2004; 55(6_suppl): S19 - S21. [Abstract] [PDF]