This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rachko, M. Articles by Stein, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rachko, M. Articles by Stein, R. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke and Paradoxical Embolism: Should A Patent Foramen Ovale Be Closed?

Case Report and Literature Review

Arshad M. Safi, MD, FACA

Dima Yeshou

Nisha Pillai, MD

Louis Salciccioli, MD

Richard A. Stein, MD

Paradoxical embolism is a well-recognized cause of stroke. While the diagnosis in the majority of the cases with a patent foramen ovale is presumptive, numerous treatment strategies have been described. However, there is no single approach that has been overwhelmingly recom mended for these patients. A patient is described who presented with ischemic stroke. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a thrombus that straddled a patent foramen ovale. Anticoagulation with intravenous heparin resulted in resolution of thrombus and neuro logic deficit. The literature regarding diagnosis and treatment of paradoxical embolism in the presence of patent foramen ovale is reviewed.

Angiology, Vol. 52, No. 11, 793-799 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970105201111


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?