SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gök, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gök, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Importance of Left Anterior Hemiblock Development in Inferior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction

Kurtulus Özdemir, MD

Yavuz Uluca, MD

Gülizar Danis, MD

Mehmet Tokaç, MD

Bülent Behlül Altunkeser, MD

Hasan Hüseyin Telli, MD

Hasan Gök, MD

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and angiographic importance of left anterior hemiblock (LAHB) during acute inferior myocardial infarction (AIMI) by comparing patient groups with and without LAHB after AIMI.

One hundred seventy-two patients (141 men and 31 women) between 28 and 84 years of age (mean 55 ± 10 years) with AIMI were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria: group I comprised 25 patients in whom ECG pattern characteristic of LAHB developed, group II comprised 147 patients without this pattern. According to the electrocardiogram, patients were placed in group I if the mean QRS axis was deviated to the left <30° in the frontal plane with the following pattern: increased S- wave voltage and decreased R-wave voltage in leads II, the appearance of a deep S-wave in lead II, and a terminal positive R-wave in lead aVR. Coronary angiography was performed within 2 weeks. A coronary stenosis was considered if the vessel diameter was narrowed by > 50%. The dominant coronary artery was classified as right or left or balanced. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated from left ventriculography.

The mean age of the patients in group I was significantly higher (58 vs 54 years, p = 0.007), while the risk factors were similar in both groups. Left anterior descending (LAD) and multi vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) were found to be significantly higher in group I compared with group II (80% vs 38%, p = 0.0001; 84% vs 52%, p = 0.001, respectively). The mean LVEF was found to be lower in group I (51% vs 56%, p = 0.04). Peak creatine phosphokinase MB (CKMB) values were not different (216 vs 162 IU/L, p = 0.09). The frequency of left dominant or balanced coronary artery was determined to be higher in group I (44% vs 17%, p = 0.018).

LAHB development during AIMI can be an indicator of LAD lesions, multivessel coronary artery disease, and impaired left ventricular systolic function.

Angiology, Vol. 52, No. 11, 743-747 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970105201103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement