SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugimoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Eskandari, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugimoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Eskandari, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is Color-Flow Duplex a Good Diagnostic Test for Detection of Isolated Calf Vein Thrombosis in High-Risk Patients?

Hiroatsu Sugimoto

Tracey Richardson, RVT

Marshall W. Webster, MD

Michel S. Makaroun, MD

Mark K. Eskandari, MD

Northwestern University Medical School Division of Vascular Surgery Suite 626 Wesley 251 East Chicago Avenue Chicago, IL 60611

Color-flow duplex scanning (CDS) is a good diagnostic test for lower extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This report aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in two in-hospital populations. A total of 166 patients had routine DVT testing with both CDS and venography: 99 total joint arthroplasty patients and 67 symptomatic in-hospital patients. Isolated calf DVT was noted in 34% of arthroplasty patients and 12% of symptomatic in-hospital patients. Peroneal DVT was most common. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predic tive value (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in the symptomatic in-hospital group was 39% (16%-62%), 98% (94%-99%), 88% (65%- 99%), and 81% (71%-91%), respectively. In the arthroplasty patients these values were 13% (3%-23%), 92% (85%-99%), 60% (30%-90%), and 55% (45%-65%), respec tively. CDS has a low sensitivity in detecting isolated calf DVT among hospitalized patients and cannot be deemed an effective tool for identifying clots limited to only one or two tibial vessels.

Angiology, Vol. 51, No. 9, 705-710 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100901


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement