This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nicolaides, A.N. Articles by Belcaro, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicolaides, A.N. Articles by Belcaro, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Tissue Response to an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene External Valve Support Device: A Histologic Study in Dogs

A. Lennox, MD

G. Agus, MD

G. Geroulakos, MD, PhD

M. Sabetai, MD

L. Artese, MD

G. Belcaro, MD, PhD

Via Vespucci 65 65100 Pescara Italy

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) external valve support devices (EVS) have been used successfully in patients to restore valve function in leg veins with incompetent valves when incompetence is due to dilatation of the vein walls or elongation of the valve leaflet edges. To assess tissue response to these devices, the authors implanted 12 of them in dogs, wrapping the devices around veins in the head and neck. The dogs recovered from the implantation procedure uneventfully, and the veins remained patent on color flow Doppler scanning. Gross and histologic evaluations of vein segments and attached EVS devices after sacrifice of the dogs 30 days postoperatively showed that the ePTFE devices did not affect vein patency or the cellular composition or architecture of vein walls. There were no adverse tissue reactions to the EVS and no thrombus formation in the veins to which the EVS had been applied. Tissue attachment to the EVS was apparent in all specimens. These histologic results support clinical experiences indicating that the ePTFE EVS device is safe to use in external valvuloplasty for the treatment of venous incompetence.

Angiology, Vol. 51, No. 8, S33-S38 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100805


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?