This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Papoz, L. Articles by Simon, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Papoz, L. Articles by Simon, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Feasibility and Reliability of Ankle/Arm Blood Pressure Index in Preventive Medicine

Alice Ponton, PhD

Patrick Segond, MD

François Becker, MD

Ludovic Drouet, MD

Jaime Levenson, MD

Marc Marazanof, MD

Yves Sentou, MD

Emmanuelle Chollet, PhD

Jeanne Etiemble, PhD

Alain Simon, MD

Centre de Médecine Préventive cardiovasculaire Hôpital Broussais 96 Rue Didot 75674 Paris France

Despite its potential usefulness for assessing preclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovas cular risk, the ankle/arm blood pressure index (AAI) has not yet been the matter of study evaluating its feasibility and reliability by nonspecialist doctors in a general population. This study was planned for two steps. In step 1, the measurement of AAI, (ratio between Doppler systolic pressure at the ankle for each lower limb and the highest value of Doppler systolic pressure of the two upper limbs), should be performed by 50 general practitioners (GPs), 50 social security center physicians, and 50 occupational health physicians in 3,000 male smokers, 40 to 59 years, without clinical cardiovascular disease. In step 2, AAI measurement, coupled with echography-Doppler of iliofemoral arteries, should be repeated by a specialist in all subjects with decreased AAI (<0.90) and the first two subjects with normal AAI recruited in step 1 by each nonspecialist. The number of physicians and subjects participating in step 1 was lower than planned (80 physicians and 962 subjects) with the greatest defect for GPs (six physicians and 35 subjects) and the prevalence of decreased AAI was low (28 subjects). AAI measurement was repeated in step 2 in only 12 subjects with decreased AAI in step 1 and in 124 subjects with normal AAI in step 1. Five of the six subjects with decreased AAI in step 2 also had decreased AAI in step 1 and 123 of the 130 subjects with normal AAI in step 2 also had normal AAI in step 1. As regards echographic stenosis, decreased AAI had a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 98%. AAI seems more feasible for occupational health physicians and social security center physicians and AAI is also reliable for nonspecialists previously trained, but its predictive value as regards echographic stenosis is poor in asymptornatic subjects, which may limit its usefulness for detecting preclinical atherosclerosis.

Angiology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 463-471 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100603


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?