SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guex, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Perrin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guex, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Perrin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Edema and Leg Volume: Methods of Assessment

J.J. Guex

Michel Perrin, MD

26, chemin de Décines 69680 Chassieu France

Various techniques may be used to assess leg edema. The value of these investigations has been discussed in depth in the consensus statement made in Vaux de Cernay in 1997 and supported by Servier Research Group.

These techniques can be classified into three groups:

• The most simple is leg circumference measurement, which can be assessed by a tape measure, or more rigorously with a Leg-O-Meter. This device is a cheap and repro ducible method that has been validated and that takes into account the height at which the circumference has been measured. However, circumference measurement is not always correlated with leg (including foot) volume measurement.

• The second group of techniques assess leg volume. The most simple method is water displacement volumetry, which has been validated in terms of reproducibility. Several other devices have been used: optoelectronic methods, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (high resolution), dual X-ray absorptiometry. These methods are expensive and not all of them have been validated, but these might be the future investigations of choice. (continued on next page)

• Some other investigations assess immediate variations in volume such as water displacement using dynamic foot volumetry, rheoplethysmography, strain gauge plethysmography, and air plethysmography. The assessment made by these methods (using postural, dynamic, or compressive maneuvers) is more an assessment of the venomuscular pump and/or venous outflow than volume assessment.

In conclusion, edema, an early and frequent sign of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), can be precisely measured by several methods. This measurement can be considered one of the most objective ways of assessing treatment efficacy in CVI-associated edema.

Angiology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 9-12 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDSHome page
J. Easterbrook and M. A. Walker
The Unilateral Swollen Lower Limb: Etiology, Investigation, and Management
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, December 1, 2002; 1(4): 242 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement