SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ultrasonic Evaluation of Congestive Liver After Tricuspid Annuloplasty

Masaaki Koga

Akira Taira

Hitoshi Toyohira

Shinji Shimokawa

Yukinori Moriyama

Shunichi Watanabe

To assess the effect of tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP), the authors measured the size of the liver by using echography in the patients undergoing tricuspid annuloplasty. From April 1989 to August 1996, 18 patients underwent TAP. The authors measured preoperatively and postoperatively the hepatic index (HI) by echography, defined as follows: HI=L x D/ BSA (L: the top-to-bottom length of the left hepatic lobe; D: the front-to-back length of the left hepatic lobe; BSA: body surface area). They also calculated the reducing rate (RR) of HI. The mean HI decreased after TAP; preoperative HI: 39.7 ±11.8 vs postoper ative HI: 33.8 ±10.5 (p=0.0069). The RR of the patients with postoperatively residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) over 2 degrees (n=4) was significantly lower than that of the other patients (n=14): -11.0 ±6.0% vs 20.2 ±3.2% (p=0.0003). They conclude that the use of echography to measure the HI is a good method of assessing congestion after TAP.

Angiology, Vol. 50, No. 11, 909-914 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979905001105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement