SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borowiec, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Borowiec, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borowiec, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Borowiec, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pericarbon Pericardial Valve Prosthesis: Midterm Results of the Aortic Valve Replacement

Jan W. Borowiec

Thomas W. Dubiel

Hans-Erik Hansson

Johan Landelius

Sven-Olov Nyström

Jan W. Borowiec, MD, PhD

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery University Hospital 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden

This clinical study was undertaken to verify the encouraging results of experimental studies regarding a new pericardial bioprosthesis. From May 1989 to November 1993, 204 patients underwent an aortic valve replacement with the Pericarbon® (Sorin Biomedica Cardio S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) prosthesis. A follow-up was 100% complete and extended to 65 months (total 408 patient-years, average 2.0 ±1.4 years). Mean age at the operation was 75.1 ± 5.5 years and 96% were in NYHA clinical stage III or IV. There were 86 men and 118 women; 73 patients had an isolated aortic valve disease, 131 had a concomitant cardiosurgical procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting in 106 patients).

The operative mortality (30-day mortality) rate was 11.8% (24/204). There were 24 late deaths (5.9 ±1.2% patient-year). The actuarial probability of survival was 68 ±5% at 5 years. Four patients died of valve-related causes (one thromboembolic complica tion, two endocarditis, one anticoagulant-related hemorrhage). Actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related death was 95 ±3% at 5 years. Valve-related morbidity included seven thromboembolic episodes (1.7% patient-year), four anticoagulant-related complications (0.9% patient-year), three endocarditis (0.7% patient-year) and one reoperation (0.2% patient-year). After 5 years freedom from thromboembolic events was 83 ±7%, from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 96 ±2%, from endocarditis 97 ±2%, and from reop eration 99 ± 1 %.

Echocardiographic study performed in 30 patients showed a paraprosthetic leak in four patients, a central leak in two, and cusp thickening in another three. The clinical data showed that the Pericarbon prosthesis has valve-related morbidity. The echocardio graphic results suggest that the prosthesis can undergo a pathologic process during the first 5 years after implantation. This makes it necessary to continue the follow-up and include the larger number of patients in the echocardiographic investigation.

Angiology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1-11 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979804900101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement