This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yesil, M. Articles by Aydin, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yesil, M. Articles by Aydin, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acute Electrophysiological Effects of Dipyridamole on Sinus Node Function in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome

Murat Yeil, MD, FACA

Serdar Bayata, MD

Nursen Postacl, MD

Çetin Aydin, MD

One of the most widely used tests for evaluation of sinus node function is sinus node recovery time (SNRT), which requires right heart catheterization. On the other hand SNRT has high specificity but only moderate sensitivity in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The authors studied acute electrophysiologic effects of dipyridamole (0.40 mg/kg IV) in 16 patients with clinical SSS. All of them had normal SNRT and had undergone permanent DDD pacemaker implantation. By the aid of temporary pacing inhibition, the authors noninvasively measured the corrected sinus node recovery time (SNRTc) and sinus cycle length (SCL) before and after dipyridamole administration.

SCL was slightly decreased from a mean basal value of 1025 ±323 to 913 ±213 msec after dipyridamole administration (mean -10%), but this was not statistically signif icant. SNRTC was increased from a mean basal value of 344 ±91 to 606 ±156 msec after dipyridamole administration (+76% P0.004).

These results suggest that dipyridamole must be used cautiously in patients with SSS. Intravenous dipyridamole may be a useful test to assess sinus node function. SNRT measurement after intravenous dipyridamole may increase sensitivity of this test in patients with suspected SSS and normal SNRT.

Angiology, Vol. 48, No. 12, 1051-1054 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979704801205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?