SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RuDusky, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by RuDusky, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RuDusky, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by RuDusky, B. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Errors of Computer Electrocardiography

Basil M. RuDusky, MD, FACA

Basil M. RuDusky, MD, FACA

Suite 208 15 Public Square Wilkes Barre, PA 18701

A review of 6938 computer-generated electrocardiogram interpretations was undertaken by a single cardiologist. The computer-assisted program correctly interpreted 51.6% of the tracings. One or more corrections were necessary in 48.4%. The greatest number of incorrect interpretations involved repolarization (T wave) abnormalities, followed by ST segment changes. It is mandatory that computer-generated ECG interpretations be reviewed by an experienced electrocardiographer. Reliance on nonreviewed ECG inter pretations may result in incorrect diagnoses that could lead to inappropriate manage ment decisions.

Angiology, Vol. 48, No. 12, 1045-1050 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979704801204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement