SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alam, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pitfalls in the Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection

Sarine Patel, MD

Mohsin Alam, MD

Howard Rosman, MD

Mohsin Alam, MD

Henry Ford Hospital 2799 West Grand Boulevard Detroit, MI 48202

The authors studied 25 patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and/or trans esophageal echocardiography (TEE) for suspected aortic dissection. Of these, aortic dissection was diagnosed correctly in 19 patients, but in 6 the echocardiographic findings for dissection were atypical or false-positive. In patient 1, the TEE revealed a dilatated proximal aortic root. TEE showed a possible flap but was nondiagnostic. The diagnosis was made by computed tomography (CT) and confirmed at surgery to be type 1 dissec tion. In patient 2, the TTE depicted flail aortic cusps, questionable vegetations, and dilatated aortic root. In patient 3, TTE demonstrated moderate pericardial effusion with hematoma but no dissection. Type 1 dissection was subsequently confirmed at autopsy in both. Patient 4 had TEE diagnosis of type 3 dissection. However, reevaluation of the study by a senior sonographer just prior to surgery led to the correct diagnosis of type 1 dissection. Patients 5 and 6 had dilatated ascending aortas with linear echoes within the lumen on TEE and were reported as having type 1 dissections. CT and/or angiography did not reveal dissection in either patient. In conclusion, TTE and TEE are vaulable tests in diagnosing aortic dissection. However, atypical features, misdiagnosis of the site of dissection, or false-positive studies can occur.

Angiology, Vol. 48, No. 11, 939-946 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979704801102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement