This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Postaci, N. Articles by Bayata, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Postaci, N. Articles by Bayata, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Influence of Different AV Delays on Left Ventricular Diastolic Functions and on Incidence of Diastolic Mitral Regurgitation

Cardiology Department, Izmir State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

Murat Yeil

Cardiology Department, Izmir State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

Ibrahim Susam

Cardiology Department, Izmir State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

Serdar Bayata

Cardiology Department, Izmir State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

In patients with a DDD pacemaker (PM), programming of atrioventricular (AV) delay can influence ventricular filling and function. In this study the authors used color Doppler echocardiography to evaluate the effect of different AV delays on left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) and on the incidence of diastolic mitral regurgitation.

In 26 patients with DDD PM, the following parameters were evaluated during five different AV delays by echocardiography: (1) mitral E wave amplitude (by pulsed Doppler), (2) mitral A wave amplitude (by pulsed Doppler), (3) isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), (4) deceleration time (DT), (5) LV diastolic dimension (LVDd), (6) LV systolic dimension (LVDs), (7) ejection fraction (EF), and (8) diastolic mitral regurgita tion (DMR). Patients had been paced for symptomatic AV block (n: 16, 62%) and sick sinus syndrome (n: 10, 38%). Mean age of patients was fifty-two (nineteen to sixty- three) and 13 (50%) of them were women. (continued on next page)

Correlation was sought between AV delay and investigated parameters. The correla tion coefficients of AV delay and E wave, A wave, IVRT, DT, LVDd, LVDs, and EF were -0.137, 0.243, 0.541, 0.031, 0.210, 0.241, and -0.184 respectively. DMR was detected in all cases when AV delay was increased more than 150 msec.

In conclusion, a slight correlation was found between AV delay and IVRT (r: 0.541). Other parameters of LV diastolic and systolic function did not correlate with AV delay. Second, DMR was observed in all patients when the AV delay was prolonged more than 150 msec.

Angiology, Vol. 47, No. 9, 895-899 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979604700908


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?