SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Steinle, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Steinle, B. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do Physicians' Beliefs About Coronary Risk Factors Account for Poor Screening and Treatment Rates?

David G. Meyers

Departments of Internal Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Brad T. Steinle

Departments of Internal Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

The authors hypothesized that the widely observed low rates of coronary risk factor screening and treatment among cardiologists could be due to lack of belief in the importance of risk factors. They performed an audit of 160 randomly selected medical records of patients with coronary artery disease and surveyed the attending physicians' ranking of importance of individual risk factors to determine the extent of risk factor screening and treatment done by these physicians. Screening and treatment rates for individual risk factors were highly variable but generally well below expected. There was no correlation among rank orders of screening rates, treatment rates, and physician-rated importance of each risk factor. These results suggest that lack of belief in risk factor importance does not explain failure of physicians to screen for and treat risk factors in coronary patients.

Angiology, Vol. 47, No. 8, 783-787 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979604700805
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement