SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, K.M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Bharathan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, K.M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Bharathan, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pacing-Induced ST Segment Deviation in Patients with Unstable Angina: Clinical, Angiographic, and Hemodynamic Correlation

K.M.A. Hussain

Department of Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York

L. Gould

Department of Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York

E.V. Pomerantsev

Department of Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York

M. Angirekula

Department of Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York

T. Bharathan

Department of Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York

To assess the clinical, coronary arteriographic, and hemodynamic differences between the unstable angina patients manifesting ST segment depression and those showing ST segment elevation as well as those demonstrating chest pain only without ST segment deviation during pacing, low-dose digital subtraction ventriculography was performed in 33 patients before and after abrupt cessation of atrial pacing during selective coronary arteriography. Transient ST segment depression during pacing was observed in 17 patients (52%), whereas 6 patients (18%) showed ST segment elevation; however, 10 patients (30%) did not manifest any ST segment deviation in spite of typical chest pain. Hypertension and a history of myocardial infarction were observed in a significantly higher (P < 0.05) proportion of patients with ST segment depression than in those with ST elevation. Patients who manifested ST segment depression during pacing had a higher incidence of triple-vessel disease (65 vs 17%; P < 0.05) as compared with the patients with ST segment elevation. Indirect evidence of intracoronary thrombi (complicated lesion, abrupt occlusion, and intraluminal filling defect) was noticed in a higher frequency (P < 0.05) in the group of patients with ST elevation during pacing. In patients with ST segment depression, no significant changes of global left ventricular (LV) func tional parameters were observed. However, the length of the LV severe hypokinetic region was increased significantly (6.2 ±3.1 vs 23.5 ±6.2%; P < 0.05) during pacing in this group of patients. The shortening of the affected segments of the left ventricle was decreased significantly (52.3 ±3.6 vs 38.3 ±4.9%; P < 0.05) in these patients during pacing. In the group of patients with ST segment elevation during pacing, decrease in ejection fraction was associated with significant (P < 0.01) increase in midwall equato rial diastolic stress as compared with the patients with pacing-induced ST segment depression as well as patients without ST segment deviation. In the group of patients without ST segment deviation during pacing there was no considerable aggravation of LV global or regional function. This distinction should be taken into consideration in evalu ating patients with unstable angina for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

Angiology, Vol. 46, No. 7, 567-576 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979504600703


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement