This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Elliott, C. G. Articles by Davidson, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elliott, C. G. Articles by Davidson, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Duplex Ultrasonography for the Detection of Deep Vein Thrombi After Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

University of Utah

Mary Suchyta, D.O.

University of Utah

Steven C. Rose, M.D.

Department of Radiology of the University of Utah

Steve Talbot, R.V.T.

Pulmonary Division of the Departments of Medicine of the LDS Hospital

Clynn Ford, M.D.

Department of Surgery of the LDS Hospital

Gary Raskob, M.Sc.

Department of Medicine of the University of Oklahoma

Russell Hull, M.B.B.S., M.Sc.

University of Calgary

Bruce Davidson, M.D., M.P.H.

Wyeth-Ayerst Clinical Research

The usefulness of real-time duplex ultrasonography (DU) as a screening test for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in high-risk patients remains uncertain. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of DU for the detection of DVT, the authors prospectively studied 178 consecutive patients after total hip (n=113) or total knee (n = 66) arthroplasty. The deep veins from the inguinal ligament to the ankle were examined first by continuous wave and then by pulsed Doppler signals as needed with real-time gray-scale ultrasound imaging using the criteria of vein noncompressibility to define DVT. Ascending contrast venography was performed within twelve hours after DU studies. Venograms and DU were interpreted independently. DU was attempted on 177 lower extremities (2 patients refused) but was judged adequate for interpretation for only 145 (82%). Venography could not be performed for 28 lower extremities and was technically inadequate for 8 studies. The primary analysis included 119 examinations for which adequate DU and ascending venograms were interpreted. DU was positive in 17 of 27 lower extremities with DVT (23 calf, 4 proximal) diagnosed by venography (sensitivity = .63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .42 to .81), and DU was negative in 85 of 92 lower extremities with normal venograms (specificity = .92; 95% CI = .85 to .97). A secondary analysis of 81 prospectively collected anatomically complete DU studies demonstrated a sensitivity of .80 (95% CI = .56 to .94) and a specificity of .90 (95% CI = .80 to .96). The authors conclude that real-time DU is not sensitive for the detection of venographically demonstrable calf DVT in the operated-on lower extremity following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Real-time DU is specific for the diagnosis of DVT following total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Angiology, Vol. 44, No. 1, 26-33 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979304400105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?