SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Niland, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Niland, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Double-Blind Comparison of the Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Electrocardiographic Effects of Sodium Meglumine Ioxaglate or Iohexol During Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization

Ronald Petersen, M.D.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Charles R. McKay, M.D., F.A.C.A.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

David T. Kawanishi, M.D.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Adam Kotlewski, M.D.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Karen Parise, R.N., B.S.N.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Joyce C. Niland, Ph.D.

Section of Cardiology, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

The clinical effects and the maximal hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of two low-osmolality radiographic contrast media (ioxaglate and iohex ol) were directly compared during diagnostic cardiac catheterization in a double- blind, randomized study in 80 patients. Because small changes were expected after injection of both of these agents, sensitive ECG and intracardiac-pressure- monitoring methods were used, and maximal changes, as well as mean changes in variables, were analyzed.

Symptoms were absent, mild, or moderate in 67-77% of patients after left ventriculography and in 97-100% of patients after coronary arteriography. Af ter left ventriculography, maximum and minimum left ventricular systolic pres sure and end-diastolic pressure, the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dp/dt), heart rate, were significantly altered over the two-minute observation period but were not different from the preinjection values at two minutes after both agents. Small but significant increases in mean aortic pressure, cardiac out put, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures were seen at two minutes after both agents.

Persistent prolongation of QTc interval over two minutes after ioxaglate injec tion was not associated with ectopy or clinical events. After coronary arteriog raphy maximum and minimum aortic pressures, ST and T wave segment displacements, and QTc intervals were significantly altered after both agents, but all variables had returned to preinjection values by two minutes. Compari son of the mean changes over time showed that only QTc intervals were altered after left ventriculography. Direct comparison of the maximum changes between the two agents showed that both contrast agents caused similar hemodynamic and electrocardiographic changes except for small but significantly greater decreases in heart rate with iohexol after left ventriculography and after right coronary arteriography.

These contrast agents have small differences in osmolality and significant differences in sodium content. Clinical events of nausea and heat sensation were noted more often in the ioxaglate group, but the frequency did not reach statistical significance. Analyses of maximal changes using sensitive monitoring devices showed that the two agents have substantially similar hemodynamic and elec trocardiographic effects. Analysis of mean changes over time was less sensitive in identifying small, transient changes and differences between the two agents.

Angiology, Vol. 43, No. 9, 765-780 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979204300907


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement