SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eber, B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eber, B.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation of the Antihypertensive Effect of Lisinopril Compared with Nifedipine in Patients with Mild to Severe Essential Hypertension

Bernd Eber

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Helmut Brussee

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Brigitte Rotman

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Rudolf Kramer

General Hospital of Linz, Linz, Austria

Werner Klein

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of Graz, Graz, Austria

For several reasons, increasing numbers of patients with hypertension are treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel block ers. In a twenty-four week, double-blind, randomized, parallel study, the anti hypertensive effect of lisinopril (20 to 80 mg qd) and nifedipine (20 to 80 mg bid) were compared in 21 patients. Fourteen patients received lisinopril (mean dose 35 mg), and 7 patients received nifedipine (mean dose 54 mg). By the end of week 12, 8 patients had responded (supine diastolic pressure ≤ 90 mg) to lisinopril and 5 to nifedipine. At the end of the study supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 172/104 to 149/92 mmHg with lisinopril and from 171/102 to 158/94 mmHg with nifedipine. No significant difference be tween the two treatments was detected. Three patients were reported to have at least one clinical adverse experience during the active treatment period, 1 in the lisinopril group and 2 in the nifedipine group. No serious clinical adverse experiences were recorded.

In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine are both effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with mild to severe hypertension. Lisinopril qd and nifedi pine slow release bid produce similar decreases in blood pressure after twelve weeks of therapy and the safety profiles of the two drugs are similar.

Angiology, Vol. 43, No. 6, 482-489 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979204300605


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
P. K. Jacobsen
Review: Preventing End-Stage Renal Disease in Diabetic Patients -- Dual Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System (Part II)
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2005; 6(2): 55 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement