SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borrero, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rossini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borrero, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rossini, M., JR
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Bacteriology of 100 Consecutive Diabetic Foot Infections and In Vitro Susceptibility to Ampicillin/Sulbactam Versus Cefoxitin

Edgar Borrero

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland

Michael Rossini, JR

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland

One of the major complications of diabetes mellitus is the occurrence of diabetic foot infection. The polymicrobial nature of diabetic foot infection has been well documented in the literature.

In order to avoid amputation of the tissue affected, the ulceration and infec tion must be appropriately diagnosed and treated. This paper describes the microbiologic and clinical features obtained from 100 consecutive diabetic in fected foot patients treated with either cefoxitin or ampicillin/sulbactam.

Angiology, Vol. 43, No. 4, 357-361 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979204300411
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
B. L. Erstad and K. E. McIntyre JR
Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Ampicillin/Sulbactam and Cefoxitin for Diabetic Foot Infections
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 1997; 31(4): 419 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Dorigo, A. M. Cameli, M. Trapani, D. Raspanti, M. Torri, and G. Mosconi
Efficacy of Femoral Intra-arterial Administration of Teicoplanin in Gram-Positive Diabetic Foot Infections
Angiology, December 1, 1995; 46(12): 1115 - 1122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Advertisement