SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breisblatt, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, P.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breisblatt, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, P.S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Same-Day Angioplasty and Diagnostic Catheterization: Safe and Effective but Riskier in Unstable Angina

Warren M. Breisblatt

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Robert J. Ruffner

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Barry F. Uretsky

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

P.S. Reddy

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was performed at the time of the diagnostic catheterization in 188 patients (215 lesions) at a University Hospital in order to assess the efficacy of this approach and the potential role it should play in the evaluation and treatment of patients. Patients either presented for diagnostic catheterization for evaluation of stable coronary disease (79 patients) or for unstable or new onset anginal symptoms (109 patients). Lesions were graded as to whether they were simple or complex; and post angioplasty films were reviewed for success rate, and degree of revascularization. Patients who were referred for stable anginal symptoms had a slightly higher success rate (91%) compared to those who were referred for new onset or more unstable symptomatology (85%, p = ns). Additionally, lesions morphology was judged to be more complex in unstable patients, as 67% had complex lesions with the presence of thrombus or ulcerated plaque in 56% of these stenoses. Angioplasty success was high for simple lesions in all patients, but was most unfavorable for complex stenoses in patients who presented with unstable symptoms (81% success rate). In patients who presented with new onset or unstable symptoms multivessel disease was present in 69% and angioplasty was more often geared at dilating a culprit stenosis leaving only 49% of these patients with complete revascularization. On the other hand, in 76% of those patients who presented with stable angina complete revascularization was a common outcome. Length of hospital stay was considerably shorter at 2.9 ± 0.8 days in those patients who presented with stable symptoms. Complication rate was only 2.5% in this patient group, but in those with unstable or new onset angina, complication rate was 11% and would appear to reflect the complex morphology of the lesions that were dilated. In patients with suitable anatomy low risk lesions, and appropriate indications, same day angioplasty is an effective option. But in patients with unstable symptoms and complex stenoses the increased complication rate may warrant a more conservative strategy.

Angiology, Vol. 42, No. 8, 607-613 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979104200802


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement