SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colardyn, F.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, D.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colardyn, F.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, D.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differential Effects of Vasodilators on Forearm and Calf Vessels

F. Colardyn, M.D.

Departments of Intensive Care and of Cardiology, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

D.L. Clement, M.D., Ph.D.

Departments of Intensive Care and of Cardiology, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

Because the literature comparing the effects of vasodilators on forearm and calf vessels is very scarce, the authors compared different vasodilators used in cardiovascular medicine in a group of volunteers. The peripheral effects were measured in the sitting position by plethysmography at the calf and at the forearm. At the forearm, comparable dilator effects were seen in arteries and veins. At the calf there was a trend for arterial flow to decrease as venous capacitance increased. Vascular response seen in one limb was not representative of the whole circulation. The changes observed were dependent not only on the vascular area investigated but also on the dose used.

Angiology, Vol. 41, No. 4, 313-317 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979004100408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement