This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kanemoto, N. Articles by Takahashi, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kanemoto, N. Articles by Takahashi, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Significance of U Wave Polarity in Patients with a Prior Inferior Myocardial Infarction

Department of Internal Medicine of Toai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan

Joji Hosokawa

Department of Internal Medicine of Toai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan

Masao Chino

Department of Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan

Tetsuo Takahashi

Department of Yokohama City Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

Sixty consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography and left ventriculography from six to eight weeks after the onset of definite inferior myocardial infarction were divided into three groups according to the polarity of U waves in (1) leads II, III, aVF and (2) in leads V4 to V6 (positive = Group P, flat or isoelectric = Group F, and negative = Group N). The following parame ters were analyzed: (1) ECG score; (2) global ejection fraction: (3) regional area change: (4) number of asynergic, and akinetic segmental radii; (5) number of asynergic and akinetic areas: and (6) number of diseased coronary arteries and the incidence of left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease.

There were no significant differences among the three groups according to the polarity of U waves in two subgroups by the site of U waves in age, gender, systemic blood pressure, and ECG scores. The polarity of U waves in leads II•III•aV_F (subgroupl) correlated with the size of myocardial infarction; regional area changes in inferior segment (Area 2) were 64.1±8.2 in group P1, 31.8±14.7 in group F1, and 21.0±15.8 in group N1 (p<0.01, F = 32.8). The polarity of U waves in leads V _4-6 (subgroup2) correlated with anterolateral wall motion; re gional area changes in anterolateral segments (Area 5) were 76.8± 11.6 in group P, 66.5±18.5 in group F, and 48.9±17.1 in group N (p<0.01, F = 18.6). The incidence of multivessel disease increased from group P2 (36.4%), to group F2 (54.5%), to group N2 (75.0%), and the incidence of LAD disease increased from 27.3%, to 45.5%, to 68.8%, respectively. A negative U wave in either location suggested severely decreased apical wall motion, and there was a tendency for global ejection fractions to decrease in the following order: group P, group F, and group N.

From these results, the authors conclude that the polarity of U waves may be one of the parameters correlating with the wall motion and left ventricular function in prior inferior myocardial infarction.

Angiology, Vol. 41, No. 11, 919-928 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/000331979004101105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?