SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleophas, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleophas, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing Crossover Studies for Carryover Effects

Ton J. Cleophas

Department of Medicine, Merwede Hospital Sliedrecht Dordrecht, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands

For the study of cardiovascular disease, for instance, hypertension and angina pectoris, properly de signed crossover studies are to be preferred over parallel-design stud ies. Many statisticians now propose that these studies should always be tested for carryover effects. In the present paper the author analyzes the crossover studies published after No vember, 1985, in two general and two specialist journals (New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, Angiol ogy, British Heart Journal). Of 73 pa pers only 23 (32%) consider the possi bility of carryover effects. Of these latter papers 12 (16%) perform sta tistical tests for these effects. The results of these tests were shown in only 7 papers (10%). It is concluded that there is a discrepancy between the statistical recommendations and the data presented in the literature.

Angiology, Vol. 40, No. 4, 287-293 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978904000408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement