This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kinney, E. L. Articles by Wright, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kinney, E. L. Articles by Wright, R. J., II Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Mitral Valve Prolapse Mobility Aids Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can the Parasternal Long Axis Plane Replace the Apical Four-Chamber Plane in Diagnosing Mitral Valve Prolapse?

The Reed Institute, Miami, Florida

Robert J. Wright, II

The Reed Institute, Miami, Florida

Since the mitral anulus is now known to be saddle-shaped, use of the qualitative motion of the mitral valve (MV) leaflets in the apical four- chamber plane to diagnose mitral valve prolapse (MVP) may be un sound, in that superior systolic dis placement of the MV leaflets would occur in normal subjects, as well as in patients with MVP. It has therefore been suggested that the parasternal long axis (PLAX) plane should be used to diagnose MVP. To test the feasibility of this approach, the au thors examined the predictive accu racy of PLAX prolapse and other isolated echocardiographic abnor malities versus a multivariate deci sion tree approach. PLAX prolapse, which was significantly associated with marked (> 0.7 cm) apical four- chamber prolapse, mitral regurgita tion, the presence of a thick mitral valve, and low relative body weight, was 100% specific for MVP but only 44% sensitive. Similarly, marked api cal four-chamber prolapse was 100% specific but only 53% sensitive. Api cal four-chamber prolapse, if gauged only qualitatively as present or ab sent, was 94% sensitive but only 50% specific. By contrast, the decision tree classified all 32 initial patients correctly, and in a second, test set, se lected 6 additional patients; these 6 patients had many of the clinical fea tures of MVP. These observations suggest that: (1) if prolapse is seen in the PLAX plane, the patient does have MVP; on the other hand, lack of prolapse in this plane does not ex clude the diagnosis of MVP and (2) the apical four-chamber plane, used qualitatively, does not reliably distin guish patients with MVP from those without MVP.

Angiology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 101-107 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978904000204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?