This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Floriani, M. Articles by Tiberio, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Floriani, M. Articles by Tiberio, G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Value and Limits of "Critical Auscultation" of Neck Bruits

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

S.M. Giulini

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

S. Bonardelli

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

N. Portolani

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

M. Benvenuti

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

A. Pouchè

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

G. Tiberio

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Within a group of 2,000 patients evaluated, most of them with symptoms of cerebrovascular insufficiency, 441 had a monolateral or bilateral cervical bruit. The 627 sides with an audible bruit were divided into main groups (A) sympto matic (TIA and/or stroke homolateral to the bruit), (B) possibly symptomatic (non-side-related symptoms), (C) asymptomatic (Cl, in totally asymptomatic patients; C2, in patients with symptoms dependent on the hemisphere contralat eral to the cervical bruit). Each patient was studied by means of clinical (history, blood pressure in both upper limbs, phonoendoscopic auscultation at various levels) and noninvasive instrumental examinations (CW Doppler spectrum anal ysis). An apparently primitive cervical bruit corresponded to a lesion of the carotid bifurcation in 61% of the cases (positive predictive value) whereas a normal bifurcation was detected in 70% of the cases in which the cervical bruit was considered as secondary (negative predictive value); the diagnostic accu racy of the "critical auscultation" has a value therefore of 63%, with a sensitiv ity of 84% and a specificity of 40%. The results obtained in the different groups of patients (symptomatic or asymptomatic) were not significantly different (chi square). Even though maintaining the value of a cervical bruit as a sign of carotid stenosis or occlusion and consequently confirming the importance of neck auscultation, the authors conclude that the critical auscultation as com monly performed is not capable of excluding the presence of a carotid lesion with sufficient reliability, even in totally asymptomatic patients.

Angiology, Vol. 39, No. 11, 967-972 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978803901106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?