This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Padula, P. A. Articles by Friedmann, L. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Padula, P. A. Articles by Friedmann, L. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acquired Amputation and Prostheses Before the Sixteenth Century

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nassau County Medical Center, East Meadow, N.Y.

Lawrence W. Friedmann, M.D., F.A.C.A., F.I.C.A.

Angiology, The Journal of Vascular Disease; Professor of Rehabilitation Medicine, S.U.N.Y.-Stony Brook, New York

Amputation has been practiced at least since 43,000 B.C.E. for ritualistic, punitive, curative, or vocational reasons. Fitting with prostheses has been done since at least 1,500 B.C.E.

Anesthetics were used, but which ones is not known. Analgesics such as salicylates in plants, narcotics such as cocaine and opium, and soporifics such as alcohol and peyote were common.

Amputation was done with knives, axes, and saws. Control of bleeding was by ligature, cautery, bandaging pressure, and plant and animal products. Suture was with cotton or human hair, acacia and other thorns, ant jaws, and sinew, with or without a drain.

Prostheses were made of fiber, wood, bone, and metals, often lined with rags.

Angiology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 133-141 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978703800207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?