SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LePage, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LePage, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Gangrene of the Foot: A Complication of Phlebography

James R. LePage, M.D., F.A.C.A., F.I.C.A.

Oral Roberts University School of Medicine, Cardiac Vascular and Interventional Radiology, City of Faith Medical and Research Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma

One believes there is a necessity to bring to widespread attention a most serious complication of what is often considered a mundane radiological exami nation - lower extremity contrast venography. So mundane is it considered in fact, that outside of resident teaching programs, an informal telephone survey of 15 hospitals from 240 beds to 780 beds revealed that a number of injections and examinations: (a) were conducted entirely by technologists without any pre tense of radiologist supervision; (b) that the radiologist "supervised" the injec tion (i.e. was in the "immediate vicinity") or; (c) injection was preferentially done by the radiologist, but no reason was seen why a skilled non-physician could not conduct the examination.1

Angiology, Vol. 36, No. 6, 399-405 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978503600609


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement