SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramesh Adiga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nayden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramesh Adiga, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nayden, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Noninvasive Methods in the Diagnosis of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease: A Correlation with Carotid Arteriography in Eighty Patients

K. Ramesh Adiga

Susan J. Fresso

John Nayden

Five hundred fifty-nine patients were evaluted for carotid artery disease in the Blood Flow Laboratory by the following direct and indirect noninvasive methods: 1. Periorbital doppler examination; 2. Ocular pneumoplethysmography (Gee); 3. Pulsed doppler ultrasonic arteriography; and 4. Sound spectral analysis with a pulsed doppler.

Carotid arteriograms were available for comparison with one hundred fifty- seven vessels (80 patients). Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy was established for each noninvasive modality by correlation with the angiographic findings.

For detection of stenoses greater than 50% by diameter reduction, sensitivity was 98%. Sound spectral analysis and ultrasonic arteriography were found to yield a higher sensitivity when compared to the other noninvasive methods in detecting stenoses of less than 50%. In our hands, disturbed spectral flow patterns do not always correlate with the degree of stenosis in non-hemodynamic lesions.

Our results indicate that proper patient selection for angiographic examina tion can be made through noninvasive screening.

Angiology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 331-340 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978403500602


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement