This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Halsted, G. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Halsted, G. O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Femoro-Popliteal Bypass Simplified

Department of Surgery, Englewood Hospital, Englewood, New Jersey

There is increasing emphasis on carrying femoro-popliteal bypass grafts below the knee and most vascular surgeons agree that reversed saphenous vein makes the best graft.

However, some other considerations have become important and deserve consideration.

P.T.F.E. grafts in this location have almost as good a long term patency rate as autologous vein grafts.

Some very experienced vascular surgeons have indicated their preference for this type of graft, citing some of these pertinent reasons:

Peripheral vascular disease usually is associated with lesions in other vessels. Since coronary artery bypass has become so commonly used to stave off myocardial infarction some thought should be given to preservation of suitable saphenous veins for this purpose.

Harvesting the saphenous vein adds additional surgical trauma, time, exposure to sepsis, lymphatic interruption and extra incisions.

Once we opt for preferential P.T.F.E. grafts, then we start to search for a simpler technique.

Angiology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 137-138 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978403500302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?