SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeSa'Neto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Benchimol, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeSa'Neto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Benchimol, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ratio of Total Amplitude to Diastolic Wave on the Apexcardiogram. Findings in Aortic Regurgitation and Other Cardiac Lesions

Artur DeSa'Neto

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona

Philippe Reyns

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona

Kenneth B. Desser

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona

Alberto Benchimol

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Good Samaritan Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona

Utilizing the apexcardiogram, the ratio of total amplitude to the height of the total diastolic wave was determined. Compared with a mean (± 1 SD) value of 21 ± 4% for normal subjects there were statistically significant differences in those patients with isolated aortic regurgitation (30 ± 10%, P = 0.01), aortic stenosis (12 ± 11%, P < 0.025) and mitral insufficiency (14 ± 8%, P < 0.025). There were no significant changes of this ratio in subjects with combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency (24 ± 9%, P < 0.25), triple vessel coronary artery disease (19 ± 7%, P < 0.25) and mitral valve prolapse (23 ± 10%, P < 0.35). There was a trend for higher ratio values in patients with greater angiographic evidence of aortic insufficiency, but no correlation between the ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. These altera tions of the apexcardiogram accord with hemodynamic findings in the presence of each respective lesion. It is concluded that this ratio is useful for the noninvasive assessment of isolated aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency.

Angiology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 321-328 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/000331978103200504


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement