SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Angiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padigala, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, M. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padigala, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Renal Cortical Thickness as a Predictor of Renal Function and Blood Pressure Status Post Renal Artery Stenting

Kiran Kumar Padigala*, Edward J. Hartle, H Lester Kirchner, and Michael F. Schultz

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: padigalakk2009{at}yahoo.com.


   Abstract

Renal artery stenting is a widely performed procedure for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. It is very important to identify patients that will benefit from this procedure as this may involve potential risk and complications. Our study is a retrospective analysis aimed at evaluation of mid-pole renal cortical thickness at the time of stenting and correlating with renal function and blood pressure after the procedure. A total of 48 procedures were done on 31 patients evaluated in this study. The change in SBP was greater for the abnormal group compared to the normal group (-1.49 mmHg vs. -0.98 mmHg, P = 0.7813). The change in DBP was greater for the abnormal group compared to the normal group (-0.68 mmHg vs. 0.04 mmHg, P = 0.3809). The change in odds of having a GFR in higher categories was greater for the abnormal group compared to the normal group (OR =1.23 vs. 1.05, P = 0.3085). Our study did not show a significant association of renal cortical thickness and outcomes of BP and GFR following stenting of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. However, we did find a greater improvement in BP and GFR in patients with abnormal cortical thickness compared to those with normal cortical thickness.

First published on July 21, 2009
Angiology 2009, doi:10.1177/0003319709339587


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement